Reviews - Reader comments

Samsung M8910 Pixon12 review: By the dozen

03 July 2009 | Read the review | Post your comment
Samsung M8910 Pixon12 review: By the dozen - read the full textThe Pixon12 is about to be three times lucky. But any way you look at it, it’s nothing short of a dozen. Not that we wanted to make that much fuss, but a bunch of 12 megapixel pictures coming from a phone are always worth it...

 

Pages: 1 23

> In reply to Venom @ 2009-08-04 13:10 from 0v@3they all paid SE for the patent

  • Reply
  • 2009-11-20 18:00
  • t7Gx

> In reply to David Smillie @ 2009-07-08 16:51 from Srq4even nokia have it in 8 mp camera

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-23 15:10
  • TL5j

plz tell me if these phone is speed

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-11 23:26
  • fvEP

No Audio Quality Test and No CPU on the specifications??

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-04 20:30
  • w0QN

> In reply to Venom @ 2009-08-04 13:10 from 0v@3even LG phones has it!

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-04 19:36
  • P43f

Wasn't face and smile detection patented by SE already? How come Pixon has it?

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-04 13:10
  • 0v@3

Looks good and just had a play, should these phones be sold on lower priced contracts these days due to current bank situations? would be better for sales don't ya think

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-04 12:28
  • mCSY

Why didn't GSMArena say anything on the bettery life???
If it is same as the M8800 that I currently have then I don't see the Pixon12 as a major upgrade... I hope Samsung have improved the battery on the Pixon12, a 1200mAh or even a 1500mAh that are used on the Omnia's would make the Pixon12 a great phone. ;-)

  • Reply
  • 2009-07-29 15:42
  • Ge@H

@David Smillie:
hmph, only if you want to pay orange or voda! They usually brand it, remove many features, etc, etc....

£24 over 24 months = £576 !!!

google it, the price estimates say a lot less for off contract....

  • Reply
  • 2009-07-28 23:09
  • 3GQa

is the D1 video recording quality the same as m8800? 'cause m8800 video recording works fine for me.. so if they're the same then no problem. can anyone tell me please. thanks.

  • Reply
  • 2009-07-12 01:16
  • vpaV

Nothing on battery life??

  • Reply
  • 2009-07-09 14:41
  • b6HA

> In reply to David Smillie @ 2009-07-08 13:56 from Srq4RELEASE DATE:

Exclusive to Phones4u Pre-order for delivery 1st Aug 2009

http://www.phones4u.co.uk/shop...emKey=281460

  • Reply
  • 2009-07-08 16:51
  • Srq4

> In reply to Jet @ 2009-07-07 18:42 from M{3NActually, in the review, GSM said that it looks(feels) like it DOES have a Jet matching 800mhz processor. And talking about the Jet, i think the late arrival of Pixon12 is to give the Jet a bit of breathing space....a few extra weeks for sales.

  • Reply
  • 2009-07-08 13:56
  • Srq4

pics r very ordinary

  • Reply
  • 2009-07-08 12:47
  • 2@fJ

I already have the jet tbh the phone is ok but nothing is ground breaking. but photos took a long time to be loaded and flicking from picture to another takes long time too. pain..
I wonder if this phone can do better with 12mp photos!!
btw the jet is 800mhz but this is not.

  • Reply
  • 2009-07-07 18:42
  • M{3N

So when exactly is this phone coming out then? It was supposed to have been released in June, It's July and still nothing.

  • Reply
  • 2009-07-06 23:52
  • pKxY

This phone will suffer the same fate like N96 due to its very hefty price tag knowing that it is not a smartphone

  • Reply
  • 2009-07-06 17:36
  • w0QN

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-07-06 11:07 from 2CGhxenon is no good on taking pics far away either..so no win there..

And Samsung making a great but niche phone has nothing to do with Nokias success or failure..think before posting.

  • Reply
  • 2009-07-06 13:39
  • pWLw

This is a very interesting phone| I think with this one Samsung could rule the market, but since the price is waaay to high it will remain only to the rich enugh.

Anyway, good job Samsung! Nokia is going down! ... fast!

  • Reply
  • 2009-07-06 12:55
  • M3gi

> In reply to Iyerd @ 2009-07-05 04:19 from 04VW" "but Nokia N86 with its incomparably weaker LED flash (be it 3rd generation or whatever) can't come anywhere closer to them."

what? did you see the images, the 'Weaker LED' matched the Xenon's pretty daam well for a LED. "

Wait until you move about 3-4 meters away from the object. You will see the difference. For close-ups the LED is quite good but not for longer distances.

  • Reply
  • 2009-07-06 11:07
  • 2CGh
Pages: 1 23

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.