Nokia 6720 classic - user opinions and reviews
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.3
- Features
-
7.4
- Performance
-
7.4
- Anonymous
- Report
Hi !Guys I am intend to buy one Nokia mobile around USD 150 not more then that with Camera and good music plz advise me which mobile should I buy. I am getting confused now. Thanks
- Reply
- 2009-02-22 05:39
- mIff
- U
- matias
- Report
i wish to have this phone as my new phone, i think is an evolution of my nokia 6120classic
- Reply
- 2009-02-22 02:32
- PuvH
- U
- Dal
- Report
Give this phone wi-fi and I'll get it. What is the difference btw this phone and 6220c without a wi-fi. Its obviously not gonna sell with a wi-fi.
- Reply
- 2009-02-21 17:27
- M@T2
- C
- Anonymous
- Report
hey man i really love the icons on the new nokias....like 6720 classic.can i put them on nokia n79 somehow>>with software update or something..someone pls tell me.tnxxx in advice
- Reply
- 2009-02-21 16:43
- 0UZu
- U
- Original_Jamaican
- Report
> In reply to jemray2099 @ 2009-02-16 15:49 from 47rfJEMRAY I was saying the same thing. It has a striking resemblance of 6233. Even though I saw the photos earlier this week, the thought never grabbed me until I watched a video presentation with it just now at Nokia's Europe website showcasing the activities at the MWC in Barcelona. Even the materials look the same. I wouldn't be surprised if it's just as loud too with those big speaker grills.
- Reply
- 2009-02-21 16:37
- kiQi
- R
- f
- Report
> In reply to Zzzz @ 2009-02-17 11:31 from uk}dabout the video recording, gsmarena probably made a typo bcoz in the overview of the nokia in mwc, it said in the 6710 nav that "the camera has gone from 3 to 5 megapixels but video recording remains unchanged" so 6710 must have the vga 15fps video recorder and the 6720 vga 30fps video.
- Reply
- 2009-02-20 23:23
- nCbx
- R
- Jay
- Report
Wow, this is the worst design ive ever seen. Im disapointed nokia.
- Reply
- 2009-02-20 22:08
- 3LX{
- U
- Robert
- Report
In 6220c is xenon flash, 30 fps recording, bet baterry is very bad
In 6720c is better baterry
- Reply
- 2009-02-20 19:01
- 0xQ7
- U
- 100% JP
- Report
what's the different between 6720 classic & 6220 classic??
- Reply
- 2009-02-20 16:56
- mMUe
- Q
- Dani
- Report
The 6220 Classic has terrible build quality, the keypad and cover cracks within 2 weeks!
- Reply
- 2009-02-19 00:34
- nEw}
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
OMG
Ewwwww! It looks gross! Nothing special except for the price I believe!
Same old same old...
- Reply
- 2009-02-18 14:00
- tVHt
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
no wi-fi is dissappointing...
if there was wi-fi in this phone... it would sell in greater volumes..
i like this phone... n i am willing to wait for this phone..
- Reply
- 2009-02-17 17:12
- 2SMt
- C
- sinaga
- Report
i this goin into Indonesian market?? hows that hassan aula?
- Reply
- 2009-02-17 15:24
- inV6
- U
- Zzzz
- Report
Strange, no Xenonflash, video at only 15fps...Why this phone when the 6220 classic is better ?? Maybe because of the terrible build quality of the 6220...
- Reply
- 2009-02-17 11:31
- uk}d
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
The battery is 5 hours more play time - 8hrs talk time compared to the 6220 having 3.5 hours
- Reply
- 2009-02-17 11:09
- M3s@
- C
- haaaaynaku!
- Report
this is a carbon copy of 6220 classic but even then 6220 classic is much better than this 6720 pweeh classic. Just put wi-fi onto 6220 classic that would be monster medium range phone.
- Reply
- 2009-02-17 06:35
- RKnT
- U
- kimkum
- Report
Ugly look..ugly look.... Nokia is always the champion gor ugly look.
- Reply
- 2009-02-17 06:33
- uEyw
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed